By Alexander D. Mehdipour, Principal Attorney at Mehdipour Law, PC · Los Angeles, California
Last reviewed August 5, 2026
These are my own general observations on repair and maintenance provisions in California commercial leases, drawn from the agreements I review for business tenants. Not legal advice, not a definitive statement of the law, and every lease allocates these obligations differently.
The clause that most often turns a workable lease into an expensive one is not the rent. It is the paragraph assigning responsibility for the HVAC system and the roof. In my experience this is where tenants unknowingly agree to fund the replacement of equipment they will never own.
The distinction that matters is between maintaining and replacing. Servicing a rooftop unit twice a year is an operating cost and a reasonable thing to ask a tenant to carry. Replacing a twenty-year-old unit that fails in year two of your lease is a capital expense on the landlord’s asset — and in a triple-net lease with broad repair language, you can end up paying for it.
How the obligation usually gets shifted
It is rarely stated bluntly. It generally arrives in one of three ways.
- Broad language in the tenant repair clause. A requirement to keep the premises “in good order, condition and repair” without carving out capital items, latent defects, or ordinary wear and tear.
- Through CAM. The lease makes the landlord responsible, then includes capital repairs in the operating expenses you reimburse. You pay either way; it just arrives as a line item.
- The surrender clause. A requirement to return the premises in the same condition as delivered, reasonable wear and tear excepted — or, worse, without that exception. That can mean paying to replace systems at the end of the term.
What I ask for
A replacement carve-out. The cleanest fix is language that the tenant maintains and repairs, but the landlord is responsible for replacement of the HVAC system, roof, and structural and building systems. If replacement is required during the term for reasons other than tenant misuse, that cost sits with the owner.
An amortization cap if a carve-out is refused. If the landlord insists on passing capital costs through, they should be amortized over the useful life of the item, with you paying only the portion falling inside your term. A tenant three years into a five-year lease should not fund a roof with a twenty-year life.
A dollar cap per occurrence or per year. Simple and easy for a landlord to accept. Anything above the cap is the landlord’s cost.
A warranty period at the start. I generally ask that the landlord warrant the HVAC, plumbing, and electrical are in good working order on delivery and remain the landlord’s responsibility for the first six to twelve months. If a system fails immediately, it was failing before you arrived.
Do the inspection before you sign
This is the practical step most tenants skip. Pay an HVAC contractor a few hundred dollars to inspect the units and give you their age and remaining life before you sign. If the answer is that a unit is eighteen years old with a typical life of fifteen to twenty years, you now know a replacement is likely during your term — and you can negotiate about it while you still have leverage, rather than discovering it in August when the unit dies.
The same applies to the roof. Ask when it was last replaced and whether there is a remaining warranty. Landlords often have this information readily available, and asking signals you are reading the document carefully.
Document the condition at delivery
Photograph everything before you take possession, and record equipment model and serial numbers. If your lease requires you to surrender in the condition delivered, you want evidence of what that condition actually was. I have seen surrender disputes turn entirely on whether the tenant could show a system was already near end of life on day one.
Where possible, attach a condition report as an exhibit to the lease itself. A signed exhibit is far stronger than photographs produced years later.
If you have a lease or LOI and want the repair and surrender provisions reviewed before you sign, call (310) 556-9692. This work is handled on an hourly or flat-fee basis.
Related reading: CAM charges and what you actually pay · Assignment and subletting · Commercial lease review and negotiation
As above, my observations and opinions rather than legal advice. Reading this does not create an attorney-client relationship.
TALK TO A LOS ANGELES ATTORNEY
Tell us what is happening and we will get back to you. Your consultation is free, and we will tell you honestly whether we think you have a case worth pursuing.
Posted on Google![]()
Jris DonnelyAugust 5, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex has been a huge help as we work through a difficult tenant situation. He has gone above and beyond and has treated the issue with the same care and attention he would give his own. His guidance has been incredibly valuable, and he is always willing to answer questions, whether they are directly related to the case or not. Working with Alex feels like having a trusted legal advisor on call. He is responsive, dedicated, and focused on actually moving things forward. He is not the kind of attorney who just runs up the bill without getting results. We truly appreciate everything he has done and highly recommend him.Posted on Google![]()
Ryan UckerJuly 31, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Working with my attorney was the best decision I could’ve made. He took the time to explain everything, kept me updated without me ever having to chase information, and genuinely cared about getting me the best possible result. What could’ve been overwhelming ended up feeling straightforward because of how well he handled my case. I’m extremely grateful for his help and would absolutely recommend him.Posted on Google![]()
Yolanda PeoplesJuly 14, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I highly recommend Alex to anyone looking for an experienced and dedicated attorney. From the beginning, he was responsive, available whenever I had questions, and kept me informed throughout my mold case. He explained everything clearly and made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me the most was how efficiently he handled my case. I have never had a lawsuit settled this fast. Alex's knowledge, professionalism, and attention to detail helped achieve a successful outcome much sooner than I expected. If you're looking for an attorney who is skilled, communicative, and truly committed to getting results for his clients, I would highly recommend Alex.Posted on Google![]()
Lis DyeJune 30, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex was nothing but kind, patient and incredibly thoughtful and hardworking through this whole process. I thought my claim had no legs, and he reached out months later and was able to settle! Could not recommend enough!Posted on Google![]()
Nhi NguyenJune 30, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
When I first reached out in December 2025, I had never hired an attorney before. I've always tried to handle things on my own, but after months of dealing with an HOA that was unresponsive to the ongoing health concerns, I realized I needed someone who could advocate for me. My home had become unlivable due to serious issues, including mold growth and water shutoffs, yet after emailing my HOA and property managers over and over - nothing was resolved. From the moment I spoke with Alex, I finally felt like some of the emotional burden was being lifted. Throughout my case, he was responsive, knowledgeable, and patient, taking the time to explain the process and answer my questions. He helped me pursue accountability and achieve a resolution after an incredibly stressful experience. I'm grateful he was willing to take on my case and guide me through my first experience working with an attorney. If you're looking for someone who genuinely advocates for his clients, I highly recommend him and his firm. Thank you Alex! I really appreciate you for the support and care you provided.Posted on Google![]()
Richard LanderosJune 8, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex Menhdipour is transparent and forthcoming as they come. He was able to articulate things to help me and my family understand. He’s knowledgeable, agile, dedicated and efficient. Me and my family highly recommend Alex MehdipourPosted on Google![]()
Morrie Hines oJune 4, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex was absolutely a honor to work with and the way he has taken care of my family during our process was only extraordinary. Alex took the case when no one else would and got us an handsome settlement I would suggest him to anyone walking this earth.Posted on Google![]()
DanielleMay 21, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
From my initial call, Alex was so calming and reassuring, he made me feel confident that my situation was valid and that we would be able to successfully reach a settlement that worked for me. He has great communication and is very professional, literally everything I could ask for in a lawyer to represent me in my habitability case.Posted on Google![]()
Nastya ValentineMay 21, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex was greatly helpful during our mold case, very calm when we were stressed, and quick to respond. Highly recommend.Posted on Google![]()
Jon NaudiMay 8, 2026Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.