Percentage Rent and Gross Sales Definitions in LA Retail Leases

What follows are our general observations and opinions. This is not legal advice, it is not a definitive statement of California law, and every situation depends on its own facts.

Percentage rent is the provision in a retail lease that requires a tenant to pay the landlord a share of sales above an agreed threshold, on top of base rent. The number that matters is not the percentage. It is the definition of gross sales, because that definition decides what the percentage is applied to — and in our experience it is drafted broadly enough that tenants end up paying on money they never kept.

If you are signing a retail lease in Los Angeles with a percentage rent clause, our view is that the gross sales definition and its exclusions deserve more negotiating attention than almost anything else in the document, including the base rent. A tenant can win a concession on rate and lose far more to a definition nobody read closely.

How the Structure Usually Works

The common arrangement is a natural breakpoint: base rent divided by the percentage rate. If base rent is a given annual figure and the rate is a stated percentage, the tenant pays that percentage on sales above the resulting number. An artificial breakpoint is simply a negotiated figure that ignores that arithmetic, and whether it sits above or below the natural breakpoint is worth checking rather than assuming.

Two mechanical points get missed. First, whether the breakpoint is tested annually or monthly — monthly testing can produce percentage rent in a strong December even where the year as a whole never cleared the threshold. Second, whether the breakpoint adjusts when base rent escalates. If base rent rises annually and the breakpoint is fixed, the tenant is paying percentage rent earlier every year without anyone renegotiating anything.

The Definition Is the Whole Argument

A broad gross sales definition typically sweeps in every sale made at, from or through the premises, by the tenant or anyone operating within it, whether for cash or credit, and whether or not the goods are delivered from the store. That last phrase is where modern retail collides with old drafting.

The exclusions we would push hardest for are these:

  • Returns, refunds, credits and allowances, and sales canceled before delivery. A tenant should not pay percentage rent on a sale it unwound.
  • Sales, use and excise taxes collected from customers and paid to the authorities. This is not the tenant’s money, and yet unamended definitions routinely capture it.
  • Credit card and payment processing fees, or at minimum an acknowledgement of how they are treated. On thin retail margins the difference is real.
  • Online and omnichannel sales. This is the live fight. Orders placed online and merely picked up in store, or shipped from a distribution center and returned in store, should be addressed explicitly rather than left to “at, from or through”.
  • Gift card sales, counted on redemption rather than on issue, so the same money is not counted twice.
  • Employee discounts, bulk and wholesale transactions, and vending or ATM income, along with insurance proceeds and the sale of fixtures, none of which are retail sales in any ordinary sense.

Records, Audits and What the Landlord Gets to See

Percentage rent clauses come with reporting and audit machinery. The tenant typically reports monthly or annually, keeps records for a stated period, and the landlord may audit — often with a provision that if the audit finds an understatement above a threshold, the tenant pays for the audit and sometimes a penalty.

We would look at three things here. The retention period should be one the tenant’s systems can actually satisfy. The understatement threshold that triggers cost-shifting should be a percentage rather than a token figure, so a rounding difference does not produce an audit bill. And there should be an outside date after which the landlord cannot reach back and re-audit a settled year — open-ended look-back rights are a liability that sits on the books indefinitely.

Why This Matters Particularly in Los Angeles

Percentage rent shows up here mostly in enclosed malls, larger shopping centers and the higher-profile street retail corridors, and less often in neighborhood strip centers. Two local features are worth knowing. Landlords in centers with anchor tenants often want percentage rent tied to co-tenancy provisions, and a tenant giving up sales data should be asking for co-tenancy protection in return — if the anchor leaves and foot traffic collapses, the tenant’s sales fall while the base rent does not.

The other is that in a market where much of the retail stock is older and ownership changes hands regularly, a gross sales definition drafted in the 1990s can arrive on a renewal in its original form. We see clauses that plainly predate e-commerce being applied to businesses that now do a substantial share of their volume online. That is a drafting problem, not a legal inevitability, and renewal is the moment to fix it.

Fees

Commercial lease review and negotiation is handled on an hourly or flat-fee basis, not on a contingency. For a lease review we can usually quote a flat fee once we have seen the document and know its length and complexity, and the arrangement is set out in writing before we start.

If you are looking at a percentage rent clause in a Los Angeles retail lease, we are glad to read the gross sales definition with you before it is signed. Call us at (310) 556-9692.

Related reading: our commercial lease review resource page, along with how CAM charges and operating expenses are calculated — the other clause where the definition does the work; use clauses and exclusivity provisions — closely tied to co-tenancy in a retail center; and why we suggest a lease review before signing.

This article reflects our general views and opinions rather than legal advice, and it is not a definitive statement of California law. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and our firm. Every matter turns on its own facts, and we would encourage you to speak with a lawyer about yours.

TALK TO A LOS ANGELES ATTORNEY

Tell us what is happening and we will get back to you. Your consultation is free, and we will tell you honestly whether we think you have a case worth pursuing.

Required

Free consultation. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship; we do not represent you unless we both sign a written agreement. We use the names you provide to check for conflicts of interest before an attorney reviews your request. Please share only basic facts for now, and do not send confidential documents until we confirm we can help. See our Privacy Policy.

Posted on Google Google
natalie gonzalez profile picture
natalie gonzalez
October 23, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex was incredibly helpful throughout a stressful mold-related housing case. He was professional, responsive, and took the time to explain what was happening at each step. I felt supported and heard, and I’m grateful for the way he handled my case and helped bring it to a resolution! I would recommend Alex to anyone looking for an attorney who is knowledgeable, caring, and committed to their clients.
Posted on Google Google
Christopher Blank profile picture
Christopher Blank
October 23, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My experience with Alex was seamless. Alex provides a hands-on boutique style experience from start to finish. Excellent communication with prompt response to any and all questions. My case was handled with competence and care. If you are looking for an attorney thats responsive and competent look no further. I would highly recommend.
Posted on Google Google
Coco profile picture
Coco
October 10, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My apartment had mold and management was dragging their feet to resolve it, and completely mishandling the situation. Then I retained Alex and long story short, I was able to hold management accountable and collect a sizeable settlement. Alex was professional, responsive, and most importantly he didn’t oversell or over promise a settlement number. He was really easy to work with and he went toe to toe with the insurance adjuster when they tried to delay the process with last minute changes. I’d recommended Alex to friends, family and internet strangers, LOL. He’s someone you need on your side.
Posted on Google Google
Diana Rosas profile picture
Diana Rosas
October 8, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’m very grateful for Alex’s guidance and support during a particularly challenging time in my life. He was compassionate, attentive, and always available to answer my questions and address my concerns. His communication throughout the process was excellent, and he worked diligently to reach a fair settlement regarding my mold and habitability case. I truly appreciate his dedication and would highly recommend him!
Posted on Google Google
Daisy Guzman profile picture
Daisy Guzman
October 2, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a great experience working with Mehdipour Law to resolve an issue with a tenant. From start to finish, he was incredibly helpful, providing clear guidance and actionable next steps throughout the entire process. What really stood out was his attention to detail and ongoing support—he even checked in afterward to follow up and make sure everything was completely taken care of. If you need a reliable, proactive, and attentive attorney, I highly recommend Mehdipour Law, PC.
Posted on Google Google
Jennis Coats profile picture
Jennis Coats
September 9, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Amazing experience with Alex. We were in a last minute contractual bind and needed additional protection, as the docs we started to receive were very complex and lengthy. Alex was super responsive and extremely quick. He simplified item, that we didn’t understand, to make sense to us. And he provided amazing advice. Our deal moved forward, with countless protections added to our side. We feel very grateful for this and highly recommend him. Thanks so much Alex!
Posted on Google Google
Saeed kohanfarsi profile picture
Saeed kohanfarsi
September 9, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
He is very easy to talk to and he explains everything simple and clear.
Posted on Google Google
Jris Donnely profile picture
Jris Donnely
August 5, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex has been a huge help as we work through a difficult tenant situation. He has gone above and beyond and has treated the issue with the same care and attention he would give his own. His guidance has been incredibly valuable, and he is always willing to answer questions, whether they are directly related to the case or not. Working with Alex feels like having a trusted legal advisor on call. He is responsive, dedicated, and focused on actually moving things forward. He is not the kind of attorney who just runs up the bill without getting results. We truly appreciate everything he has done and highly recommend him.
Posted on Google Google
Ryan Ucker profile picture
Ryan Ucker
July 31, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Working with my attorney was the best decision I could’ve made. He took the time to explain everything, kept me updated without me ever having to chase information, and genuinely cared about getting me the best possible result. What could’ve been overwhelming ended up feeling straightforward because of how well he handled my case. I’m extremely grateful for his help and would absolutely recommend him.
Posted on Google Google
Yolanda Peoples profile picture
Yolanda Peoples
July 14, 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I highly recommend Alex to anyone looking for an experienced and dedicated attorney. From the beginning, he was responsive, available whenever I had questions, and kept me informed throughout my mold case. He explained everything clearly and made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me the most was how efficiently he handled my case. I have never had a lawsuit settled this fast. Alex's knowledge, professionalism, and attention to detail helped achieve a successful outcome much sooner than I expected. If you're looking for an attorney who is skilled, communicative, and truly committed to getting results for his clients, I would highly recommend Alex.
☎ Call Us ✉ Email Us